Tradeoffs in Machine Learning: Precision vs. Recall in Healthcare #
This guide summarizes two key scenarios in healthcare where we might prefer:
- High Precision but Lower Recall
- High Recall but Lower Precision
(1) High Precision, Lower Recall #
✅ When to Use: #
- When false positives are costly or harmful
- When resources are limited
- In early screening/filtering stages
📌 Justification: #
- You want to be very confident before taking action.
- Missing some real cases is acceptable if wrongly flagging someone leads to emotional, financial, or clinical harm.
💡 Examples: #
- Genetic Testing for Rare Diseases: Only flag patients when you’re very sure. A false positive could cause unnecessary panic or life changes.
- ICU Bed Allocation: If you only have 5 beds, you’d want to use them for patients who are most certainly critical.
- Drug Discovery Pre-Screening: Select molecules that are most likely to work, even if some potential candidates are missed.
(2) High Recall, Lower Precision #
✅ When to Use: #
- When missing a real case is dangerous
- When early detection can improve outcomes
- When follow-up tests or actions are safe and cheap
📌 Justification: #
- It’s better to catch every possible case, even if you have some false alarms.
- Especially important in serious or rapidly progressing conditions.
💡 Examples: #
- Cancer Screening: Better to flag more patients for follow-up than miss someone with early-stage cancer.
- Sepsis Prediction in ER: Alerting the care team early—even with some false alarms—can save lives.
- COVID-19 Testing in High-Risk Areas: Broad detection to prevent spread, even if some healthy people test positive.
🧠 Summary Table #
Scenario | Priority | Justification | Example |
---|---|---|---|
High Precision, Lower Recall | Precision 🟢 | Avoid harm/cost from false positives | Genetic testing, ICU triage |
High Recall, Lower Precision | Recall 🟢 | Avoid missing critical or contagious conditions | Cancer screening, sepsis alert |