🤖🦿 Understanding PPO: From Language Generation to Robot Control — Code, Concepts, and Comparisons
#
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) in both large language models (LLMs, e.g., GPT-style) and classical control environments (e.g., Walker2D), focusing on the structure of the PPO update and how actions are selected during inference.
1. 🧾 PPO step()
Call — Argument-by-Argument Breakdown
#
ppo_trainer.step(
queries=[input_ids[0]], # Prompt (tokenized) — represents the current state
responses=[response_ids[0]], # Generated tokens — represents the action taken
rewards=[reward] # Scalar from reward model — score for that action
)
Mapping to Classic RL (Walker2D)
#
PPO Argument |
🤖 LLM (RLHF) |
🦿 Walker2D (Classic RL) |
queries = [input_ids[0]] |
Prompt as input (discrete tokenized state) |
Robot’s continuous state (joint angles, velocities) |
responses = [response_ids[0]] |
Generated tokens (sequence of actions) |
Applied joint torques (vector of real numbers) |
rewards = [reward] |
Reward model output (alignment score) |
Environment reward (e.g., distance walked) |
2. 🎯 Action Selection in PPO
#
How does the agent choose its next action, given a state/prompt?
🤖 LLMs (Text Generation)
#
# Given a prompt (state)
input_ids = tokenizer("What causes rain?", return_tensors="pt").input_ids
# Model outputs token logits for next action
outputs = model(input_ids=input_ids)
logits = outputs.logits[:, -1, :]
probs = torch.softmax(logits, dim=-1)
# Sample the next token (action) from distribution
next_token = torch.multinomial(probs, num_samples=1)
# Repeat to generate full response
🦿 Walker2D (Physical Control)
#
# Get current robot state
state = get_env_state() # vector like [θ1, θ2, v1, v2...]
# Policy network outputs action distribution parameters
mean, std = policy_net(state)
# Sample a continuous action (e.g., torque values)
action = torch.normal(mean, std)
# Apply action to environment
next_state, reward, done, info = env.step(action)
🔁 Comparison of Action Logic
#
Component |
🤖 LLM (RLHF) |
🦿 Walker2D (Classic RL) |
State |
Prompt text |
Robot’s physical state |
Action |
Next token (discrete) |
Joint torques (continuous) |
Policy Output |
Token logits (softmaxed) |
Mean & std dev of Gaussian per action dim |
Sampling Method |
Multinomial over vocab |
Sample from Gaussian |
Result |
Extend response with chosen token |
Step to new physical state |
🔁 PPO Mapping in LLMs (RLHF) vs Classical RL
#
Category |
PPO in LLMs (RLHF) |
🦿 PPO in Walker2D (Classic RL) |
Agent |
Language Model (e.g., GPT-2, o1) |
Control Policy Network |
Environment |
Static or semi-static prompt context |
Physics-based simulator (e.g., MuJoCo) |
State |
Prompt (or full token context so far) |
Robot’s current physical state (joint angles, velocity, etc.) |
Action |
Next token in the sequence (discrete, vocabulary-sized) |
Torque values for each joint (continuous, multi-dimensional) |
Trajectory |
Sequence of tokens (prompt + response) |
Sequence of joint states and actions over time |
Reward Signal |
Given after full response (from reward model trained via human preferences) |
Immediate reward at each time step (distance walked, balance maintained, etc.) |
Reward Nature |
Sparse, episodic, scalar (usually one reward per episode) |
Dense, frequent, multi-dimensional (continuous feedback per step) |
Goal |
Generate text aligned with human values/preferences |
Learn movement to walk forward efficiently without falling |
Policy Network |
Transformer LM (large, ~billions of params) |
Feedforward or RNN-based controller (small, e.g., MLP) |
Reference Model |
Frozen copy of base LM (used for KL-penalty regularization) |
Usually none (KL not common in Walker2D PPO) |
Training Stability |
Needs KL penalty to prevent mode collapse / nonsense generations |
PPO alone is usually enough due to continuous feedback |
Evaluation |
Human evals, reward model scores (e.g., helpfulness, safety) |
Distance walked, steps survived, control energy used |
|
🗣️ “Say the right thing, the way a human likes” |
🦿 “Move the right way, so you don’t fall” |
|
Actions are words, optimizing a sequence to match human preference |
Actions are forces, optimizing to physically walk and stay balanced |
Reference |
https://rlhfbook.com/ |
https://gymnasium.farama.org/ |